DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004410215-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-24

000103661

Contested design: 004410215-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004410215-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Salomon SAS

France (FR)

Les Croiselets, 74996 Annecy Cedex 9, France

Holder · RCD owner

Guo Guofei

SK

Tbiliská 7629/23, 831 06 Bratislava, Slovakia

Prior art cited (2)

International design

'SPEEDCROSS 3 CS' footwear design

No 5 of DM/085 379 · WIPO Global Design Database · disclosed 2015-06-26

Trade mark

figurative EUTM

EUTM No 011 655 727 · EUIPO

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of the contested footwear design under Articles 25(1)(b), (d) and (e) CDR, relying in particular on earlier international design DM/085 379 No 5 and a figurative EUTM.
  • The holder argued that the informed user would notice differences in the zig-zag ornamentation, sole and lace-eyelet areas, and that common footwear features and limited design freedom reduced the significance of similarities.
  • The Division found the informed user had relatively high attention, but the designer's freedom remained broad apart from common sole and lacing features, so small differences were insufficient.
  • Because the contested design produced no different overall impression from the earlier international design, the Division upheld the application under Article 25(1)(d) CDR and did not examine the remaining grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028