DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003866516-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-28

000104819

Contested design: 003866516-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003866516-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Abasic S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Passeo Mare Nostrum, 15, 08039 Barcelona, Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Puma SEvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Puma Way 1, 91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 3(a), arguing that the seven views contained multiple inconsistencies and showed more than one design.
  • The holder argued the differences were due to perspective, permissible omission of elements in some views, or immaterial variations, and referred to an infringement injunction decision as Annex 1.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted that some alleged differences were explainable, but found the rear-shoe views contained unexplained inconsistencies in notches and decorative lines requiring subjective interpretation.
  • Because the representations did not clearly identify a single unitary design, the RCD failed to meet Article 3(a); the application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028