DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002776518-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-10-31

000105439

Contested design: 002776518-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002776518-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

ETOS S.A.

Poland (PL)

ul. Bysewska 23, 80-298 Gdansk, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Prawno-Patentowa Ryszard Skubisz

Ryszard Skubisz

Holder · RCD owner

EVOKAII CLOTHING Karolina Grobelna

Poland (PL)

ul. Makuszyńskiego 3, 63 400 Ostrów Wielkopolski, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

hooded sweatshirt design shown in posts on the RCD holder's Facebook profile

RCD holder Facebook profile · disclosed 2014-02-11

Prior use

hooded sweatshirt design offered at the street market in Mui Ne, Vietnam

street market in Mui Ne, Vietnam

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosure of the sweatshirt design on the holder's Facebook profile and at a street market in Mui Ne, Vietnam.
  • Holder argued the Facebook screenshots were unreliable and that the posts and market appearance could not reasonably have become known to the specialised circles in the sector concerned.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook screenshots as reliable and found the holder had not rebutted the presumption that the Facebook posts and market offer were accessible to the relevant circles under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the prior design with the contested hooded sweatshirt, the Division found only minor differences and held that both created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidated026
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidated026
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidated026
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidated026