DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002377911-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-11-27

000105759

Contested design: 002377911-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002377911-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Akces-Med Spółka z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Jasionka 955B, 36-002 Jasionka, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

PATRON Bohemia a.s.

Czechia (CZ)

Českolipská 3419, 27601 Mělnik, Czechia

Represented by

Dušan Kendereški

Prior art cited (2)

Catalog

'CORZINO' perambulator/stroller shown on pages 16-17

RehaGirona CATÁLOGO 2011-2012 · RehaGirona catalogue

Web disclosure

'CORZINO' perambulator/stroller shown on the RehaGirona website

www.rehagirona.com · rehagirona.com via web archiving services · disclosed 2011-09-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier CORZINO stroller disclosures in a 2011-2012 RehaGirona catalogue and an archived 8 September 2011 webpage.
  • The holder disputed proof of disclosure and argued that several visible features were new, while the informed user would focus on specific wheel, chassis, upholstery, and seat-sidewall differences.
  • The Division found the catalogue and archived webpage sufficient to prove prior disclosure under Article 7 and held that the designer's freedom for perambulators remained broadly unconstrained overall.
  • Because the designs created the same overall impression apart from minor or insignificant differences, the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALEPRIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128