DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003212521-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-11-28

000106919

Contested design: 003212521-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

La demande en nullité est accueillie. Le dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 003212521-0008 est déclaré nul. La titulaire supporte les frais exposés par la demanderesse, fixés à 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

HSM Schuhmarketing GmbH

Germany (DE)

Werksstr. 15, 45527 Hattingen, Allemagne

Represented by

Osborne Clarke

Holder · RCD owner

AJS SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

BP 30012, 49457 St Macaire en Mauges Cedex, France

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Athletic Works "24 CHRISSY" clog-style shoe shown on www.walmart.ca

Internet Archive / www.walmart.ca · disclosed 2014-07-20

Web disclosureD2

Athletic Works "24 CHRISSY" clog-style shoe shown on www.walmart.ca

Internet Archive / www.walmart.ca · disclosed 2014-07-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier clog-style disclosures and archived Walmart webpages.
  • The holder filed no observations in response and left the invalidity claims undefended.
  • The Division accepted the archived web disclosures as prior public disclosures, rejected the novelty ground, but found the common design features dominated the minor colour differences.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1), so the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica Norma LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028