DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003998749-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-04-15

000107360

Contested design: 003998749-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003998749-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wograf Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Czołgistów 39, 94225 Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Biuro Usług Patentowych Jan Szuta

Jan Szuta

Holder · RCD owner

S&G Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

5B-089, 5/F, Phase 2, HuananGuoJiFangzhiFuzhuangYuanfuliao Wuliuqu, No.1 Huanan Avenue, Pinghu Jiedao, Longgang Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

adhesive strapless brassiere

http://www.amazon.ca; ASIN B0156TOZUK · Amazon · disclosed 2015-09-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an Amazon listing showing the earlier brassiere design before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest the evidence of prior disclosure or the substantive invalidity grounds.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon extract and ASIN evidence as sufficient proof that the earlier design had been made available to the public under Article 7 CDR.
  • Given the broad design freedom and the strong visual similarities, the Division found no different overall impression on the informed user and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028