DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006293932-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-07

000109643

Contested design: 006293932-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0062939320001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dongguan Luoma Smart Appliances Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Tianshenghu Village, Luoma Road, Luoma Village, Qingxi Town, Dongguan, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Nan Li

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Leixiang Electronics Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No.240 Group 7, Sanhuai Village, Niumasi Town, Shaodong County, Hunan Province, China, Shaodong County, Hunan 422807 People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

National design

electric hairbrush

CN 304364620 S · Chinese design publication · disclosed 2017-11-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese design CN 304364620 S for an electric hairbrush.
  • The holder did not submit any observations in reply.
  • The Division found the earlier Chinese design was publicly disclosed on 2017-11-21, before the contested RCD's filing date of 2019-03-09.
  • Given broad design freedom, the differences were minor and the contested design created the same overall impression, so it lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288