DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006540621-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-15

000109901

Contested design: 006540621-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006540621-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shen Yinzong

China (CN)

No. 324 Dengzhuang, Huankou Town, Feng County, Jiangsu Prov., People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Weiping Shi

China (CN)

No. 10, No. 4 Villager Group, Nibuqiao Village, Dongping Town, Anhua County, Hunan Province 413500, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Manuel de Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

safety vest

ASIN B075VMQ6DS · amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2017-09-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested reflective-vest design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier designs, relying in particular on Amazon evidence for D1.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the applicant’s disclosure and comparison arguments unanswered.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the vest designs shared the same overall impression despite minor differences.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked individual character and had to be declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028