DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006095501-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-24

000110641

Contested design: 006095501-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 006095501-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wenzhou Ante Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

4th Floor No.128 Daluoshan Road, Economic & Technical Development Zone, Wenzhou, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Nalanqing E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm 102, Blk 7, Lane 1, North of Bantian Food St., Bantian St., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Earlier disclosed hair clipper sold as part of the GK-800B / FGK-1201 grooming kit

GK-800B / FGK-1201 · Safeer Ajman Hypermarket flyer and related retail materials

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the hair clipper lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier GK-800B / FGK-1201 clipper disclosed in 2018 through sales, flyers and internet offers.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the 09/2018 Safeer flyer and supporting materials as sufficient prior disclosure and found no basis to exclude knowledge within the EU sector.
  • The compared trimmers produced the same overall impression on the informed user, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288