DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006503900-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-10-30

000111423

Contested design: 006503900-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0065039000001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wenzhou Bainuo Electric Appliance Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

North of the Second Floor of Building 1, No. 18 Beiwei Second Road, Ouhai, Wenzhou City (Zhejiang Province) 325036, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Ling Wang

Belgium (BE)

Domien Liekenslaan 6, 3140 Keerbergen, Belgium

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

electric comb or hairbrush

CN 304764420 S · Chinese design patent publication · disclosed 2018-08-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese Design Patent No CN 304764420 S, published on 2018-08-07.
  • The holder did not submit any observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Chinese design patent publication as prior disclosure, found broad designer freedom for electric combs or hairbrushes, and treated the colour arrangement and visible cable as minor differences.
  • Because the designs shared the same overall shape, handle, controls and decorative pattern, the contested RCD produced the same overall impression and lacked individual character, so it was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288