DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002042978-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-10

000110161

Contested design: 002042978-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0020429780001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Leifheit AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Leifheitstr., 56377 Nassau, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Sam Yi International Co., Ltd.

Taiwan (TW)

No. 135, Sec. 2, Jiaotan Rd., Fengyuan Dist., Taichung City 420, Taiwan (ROC)

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Louis L. Lepoix Folding Service Cart 1983

https://www.moma.org · MoMA website

Web disclosure

Wenko 713001500 Catering trolley

ASIN B005HDTBSC · amazon.de · disclosed 2011-02-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested foldable service trolley lacked novelty and individual character because earlier Louis L. Lepoix and Wenko trolley disclosures showed the same appearance before the filing date.
  • Holder argued the common trolley features were well known or technically determined, claimed the prior designs left only a narrow scope of protection, and alleged visible differences in the connecting element, trays, and basket.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as prior disclosure, treated the tray portions shown in broken lines as excluded, and found no visible differences between the protected features of the prior and contested designs.
  • The Division concluded the contested design was identical to the prior Wenko trolley, lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b), upheld the invalidity application, and declared the RCD invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128