DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007768239-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-11-23

000111942

Contested design: 007768239-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 007768239-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Li Zhenzhongvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No 36 Songbei Group, Songtong Administrative Village, Songtong Town, Lieshan District, Huaibei City,Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaoju Li

China (CN)

No 59 Mashan Bureau Village, Liujiahui Town, Linxian, Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (4)

Web disclosureD1

sunglasses

amazon.com

Web disclosureD2

Fashion Fire Flame Sunglasses

ASIN B07W51VK3C · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2019-08-05

Web disclosureD3

sunglasses

amazon.com

Web disclosureD4

sunglasses

amazon.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on four earlier sunglasses designs disclosed on Amazon before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest the applicant's evidence or arguments.
  • The Division found Annex B reliably proved prior disclosure of D2 on Amazon.co.uk from 2019-08-05 and accepted internet evidence as sufficient under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the visible features, the Division held the contested flame-shaped sunglasses design identical to D2, so the RCD lacked novelty and was declared invalid.
  • The application was upheld in full and the holder was ordered to bear the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119600

vs Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168