DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006852141-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-16

000112165

Contested design: 006852141-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006852141-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, United States of America

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Xiangyun Wang

China (CN)

No. 41, North of Changyu Village, Songxia Town, Changle, Fuzhou, Fujian, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 1

Crocs Blitzen II clog / Crocs 14461

ASIN B00 BNR A208 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2013-08-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested clog lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier Crocs Blitzen II clog sold on Amazon.co.uk since 9 August 2013.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as a prior disclosure and found the compared clogs shared the same overall shape, fur cuff, strap, lining and surface structure, with only minor differences.
  • The contested design produced the same overall impression as the earlier clog and was declared invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028