DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005321056-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-01-14

000109161

Contested design: 005321056-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0053210560001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

M.P.S. Holding B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Spectrumsingel 161, 2718 JR Zoetermeer, Netherlands

Represented by

Ploum

Holder · RCD owner

Classik International

IN

301, Bodke Plaza, Nashik Pune Road, Dwarka Circle, Nashik Maharashtra 422011, India

Represented by

CSY Europe

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

medical foreleg sleeves

RCD No 002201186-0002 · EUIPO design database · disclosed 2013-03-22

Registered RCD

animal clothing

RCD No 000675947-0001 · EUIPO design database · disclosed 2007-03-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on two earlier RCDs for pet medical clothing.
  • Holder argued the cited designs were different overall, many shared features were functional, and the contested design had distinct sleeves, closure, abdomen shape and zip.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of both earlier RCDs but found neither identical to the contested design once visible protected features were compared individually.
  • The Division held the contested design created a different overall impression on the informed user and rejected the invalidity application with costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131828

vs Weiming Li

2026-04-21Art 25(1)(b)305
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000126498

vs Guangzhou Jinyu Outdoor Products Co., Ltd

2024-11-29Art 25(1)(b)305
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)305