DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006497129-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-01-27

000111221

Contested design: 006497129-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0064971290005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Taizhou Huangyan Huiling Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No 78 Lianping Road, Chengjiang Street, Huangyan District, Taizhou city (Zhejiang Province) 318020, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

YongKang Sinotech Import & Export., LTD

China (CN)

No.350 tanghis industry, YongKang 321300, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

tricycle

CN 303168457 · China · disclosed 2015-04-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity based on an earlier Chinese design patent for a tricycle, arguing the contested electric motorcycle lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder argued the prior design was not a relevant disclosure and that differences in wheel configuration, bodywork, mirrors, storage box, and other features created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted publication of CN 303168457 as prior disclosure, found the informed user had a high level of attention, and considered the designer's freedom at least average for these motorcycles.
  • It held the shared front and rear bodywork, handlebars, seat, and footrest dominated the overall impression, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128