DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004886018-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-01-27

000111881

Contested design: 004886018-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0048860180004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Taizhou Huangyan Huiling Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No 78 Lianping Road, Chengjiang Street, Huangyan District, Taizhou city (Zhejiang Province) 318020, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

YongKang Sinotech Import & Export., LTD

China (CN)

No.350 tanghis industry, YongKang 321300, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

tricycle

CN 303168457 · China · disclosed 2015-04-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity based on a previously published Chinese design patent for a tricycle, arguing lack of novelty and individual character.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted prior disclosure of CN 303168457 and found the scooter designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld; the contested RCD was declared invalid and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128