DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005504941-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-02-17

000109682

Contested design: 005504941-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0055049410001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0055049410001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Piaggio & C. S.P.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Viale Rinaldo Piaggio, 25, 56025 Pontedera, (PI), Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Min Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.91-5 Gaoqiao Area before Hongjia Street, Jiaojiang District, Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province Taizhou City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Arcade & Asociados

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

motorcycle

RCD No 0021925180001 · EUIPO Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-02-10

Web disclosure

Article 'Don’t Fear the Scooter, Vespa Primavera 150 review' with images of a Vespa motorcycle

https://www.rideapart.com · rideapart.com · disclosed 2015-01-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier RCD and a Vespa scooter disclosed online.
  • Holder argued the informed user is highly attentive, design freedom is constrained by scooter function, and the cited differences create a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of both earlier designs and found at least average designer freedom for scooters.
  • It held the contested design created no different overall impression from the Vespa prior design, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128