DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008278451-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-28

000114803

Contested design: 008278451-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicants' fixed costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082784510003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicants’ costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Method Animation SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

46 avenue de Breteuil, 75007 Paris, France

Represented by

STRATO-IP

Holder · RCD owner

Zhiming Huang

China (CN)

No. 6, Yuantankeng, Shuangge Village, Huqiu Town, Anxi County, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Tong Yang Slu

Prior art cited (4)

Web disclosure

Amazon.fr offer for 'GREAHWD Ladybug girl costume'

ASIN B088WHP7S3 · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2020-05-19

Web disclosure

Amazon.fr offer for 'FZCRRDU KOCCAE Carnival Child Ladybug Costume'

ASIN B0838CSS5F · Amazon.fr · disclosed 2019-12-28

Publication

Online press release by the applicants with costume images

ZAG Announces Multiple 'MIRACULOUS' Deals · disclosed 2020-08-31

Web disclosure

Still from a YouTube video showing a ladybug costume

YouTube video 'Miraculous Ladybug costume pour Halloween' · YouTube · disclosed 2019-09-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity because the costume design allegedly lacked novelty and individual character and also invoked Article 25(1)(e).
  • They relied on Amazon.fr listings, a press release, and a YouTube video showing a similar ladybug costume before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations, facts, or evidence in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier ladybug costume and found the differences, including denser black dots and omitted accessories, did not change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028