DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008050587-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-09

000114045

Contested design: 008050587-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008050587-0001. 3. La titular sufrague las costas de la solicitante, cuantificadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Anhui Hope Child Products Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

n.º 602, Penglai Rd. Hefei 230601, República Popular de China

Holder · RCD owner

Anhui Yayale child Products Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Longtan North Road, zona de desarrollo económico y tecnológico, Shucheng, Anhui Province, República Popular de China

Represented by

Gabinete CHAILLOT

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Lionelo Annet stroller / pushchair

ASIN B081RMJ5M5; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijCFSWsniBg · YouTube / Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-04-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on the earlier Lionelo Annet stroller disclosed on Amazon and YouTube before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the applicant was improperly combining two prior models and that limited designer freedom in strollers made the identified differences sufficient to create a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon and YouTube evidence as proving prior disclosure of the same earlier design, designated D1, before 23 July 2020.
  • The Division found broad designer freedom overall and held that the shared main features outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b).
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.12

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128