DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006874392-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-17

000111741

Contested design: 006874392-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006874392-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Essential Style GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Christoph-Probst-Weg 2, 20251 Hamburg, Germany

Represented by

Elmar E. Günther

Holder · RCD owner

Αθηνα Παρνασαvia PDF extraction

GR

Οδός Λάμπρου Κατσώνη 113, 13561 Αγ. Ανάργυροι Αττικής, Greece

Represented by

Δημητρης Προκοπιου

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Instagram disclosures of a women's mini dress with three-quarter sleeves and a striped pattern

https://www.instagram.com/devotion_twins · Instagram

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing that the holder had disclosed the same dress design on Instagram and its website more than one year before filing.
  • The holder said the earlier posts showed only similar garments with substantial differences and that some online disclosures fell within the Article 7(2) grace period.
  • The Division accepted the Instagram screenshots, read with the supporting declaration, as proof of public disclosure before the filing date and before the grace period cutoff.
  • Given the broad design freedom for women's dresses, the Division found the prior and contested designs created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028