DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008490635-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-27

000115682

Contested design: 008490635-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 008490635-0002 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 008490635 -0002. 3. Las costas sufragadas por la titular, fijadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Quanzhou Lingmu Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm.310, 3F, Zixin Mansion, No.216 Jinqi Rd., Donghai St., Fengze Dist., Quanzhou, Fujian 362018, República Popular de China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Quanzhou Huanchi Trading Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

6/F, n.º 1580, Dongbin Road, Donghai Street, Fengze District, Quanzhou City, Fujian Provincia, República Popular de China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

sports shoes

RCD No 006848115-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier RCD D1 for sports shoes published before the contested filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division found D1 validly disclosed under Article 7(1), identified the informed user as a sports-shoe consumer, and considered designer freedom at least medium.
  • The shared text band, verbal elements, V-shaped side straps, sole cavities, and folded surface dominated the overall impression, so differences in heel sole and color were insufficient.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN Bavel
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028