DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006305488-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-30

000112841

Contested design: 006305488-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 0063054880001 is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 0063054880001 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Concaver Sp.z.o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Wabcz 60, 86-212 Stolno, Polen

Represented by

Michał Jędrzejewski

Holder · RCD owner

HS Motorsport UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

Germany (DE)

Königsberger Straße 9, 85386 Eching, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

wheel rim design shown in an Instagram post

Instagram account brixtonforged · disclosed 2018-09-27

Web disclosureD2

wheel rim design shown in an Instagram post

Instagram account brixtonforged · disclosed 2018-10-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier designs D1 and D2 disclosed in Instagram posts before the filing date.
  • Holder argued Instagram posts were not relevant disclosures, the contested design differed in several details, and the wheel-rim sector was saturated so small differences mattered more.
  • The Division accepted the Instagram posts as prior disclosures under Article 7, rejected novelty against D2, but found the shared five-spoke Y-shaped configuration created the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character over D2; D1 did not need to be examined further and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128