DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007397146-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-15

000115928

Contested design: 007397146-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0073971460001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Concaver Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Wabcz 60, 86212 Stolno, Poland

Represented by

Michał Jędrzejewski

Holder · RCD owner

S Dizing SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Strada Principala 557, 617106 Brusturi, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDEnclosure 1

vehicle wheel rims, radial tyre rims, hubs of vehicle wheels and wheel mounts for vehicles

Community design registration No 0073072770001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-12-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and also invoked prior rights based on its earlier RCD for vehicle wheels.
  • It relied on earlier RCD No 0073072770001, published before the filing date, arguing the designs were essentially identical and created the same overall impression.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the Division assessed the case first under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was validly disclosed and that minor differences did not alter the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.16

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128