DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008272777-0013

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-19

000115967

Contested design: 008272777-0013

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082727770013 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020 United States of America

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Li Livia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 24 Century Street, Sheffield S9 5DX, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

clog shoes

Community design No 0064273990002 · EUIPO eSearch plus / Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-05-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested clog design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Community design No 0064273990002 published on 2019-05-21.
  • The applicant relied on an eSearch plus extract of the earlier design; the holders filed no observations and did not appoint a representative.
  • The Division found the earlier registered design was disclosed and that, given broad design freedom for clogs, the minor differences did not alter the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld; the contested design was invalidated in full and the holders were ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028