DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008272777-0017

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-19

000115968

Contested design: 008272777-0017

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holders' costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0082727770017 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holders’ costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, United States of America

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Li Livia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 24 Century Street, Sheffield S9 5DX, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 1⚠ rejected as evidence

Crocs Duet Sport Clog clog sold in the applicant's online store

Item #11911 · applicant online store

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on its earlier Crocs Duet Sport Clog allegedly disclosed online in the European Union since 2012.
  • The holders filed no observations and did not appoint a professional representative despite being invited to do so.
  • The Division held that the internet extracts did not reliably prove source, date, or full website content, and the untranslated French material could be considered only insofar as self-explanatory.
  • Because prior disclosure under Article 7 CDR was not proven, the Division did not assess novelty or individual character further and rejected the application.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)027