DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008174635-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-01-12

000116449

Contested design: 008174635-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 008174635-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 008174635-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Shunli Communication Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1201, Bldg N, Toy City, No. 132, Busha Rd, Nanwan St, Longgang Dist, Shenzhen 518000, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Tianmen Juneng Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No.13, Group 5, Liangchang Village, Tuoshi Town, Tianmen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

PatentAnnex 2

mobile telephone case design

Chinese patent No CN305191543 · Chinese patent document

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested mobile phone case design lacked novelty and individual character because it was fully anticipated by Chinese patent CN305191543 submitted as Annex 2.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Chinese patent document as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and considered designer freedom broad mainly as to decoration and surface patterns.
  • Differences in colour and hole shapes were not decisive; the designs created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.0114.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124756

vs SHENZHEN ELECTRON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

2024-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)03, 1411
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038