DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015041731-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-10-22

000124756

Contested design: 015041731-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015041731-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LG Electronics INC.via PDF extraction

South Korea (KR)

128, Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07336 Republic of Korea, Republic of

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Electron Technology CO., LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Floor 1-5, Plant 2, Yingfeng Industrial Zone, Tantou Community, Songgang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen 518000 China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnexes A4 and A5

LG Electronics article showing the prior design of a portable screen integrated into a briefcase-like case (Standby Me Go)

https://live.lge.co.kr/lg-stanbyme-go/ · live.lge.co.kr · disclosed 2023-05-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over a prior design disclosed on LG's website before the contested design's priority date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the website article as prior disclosure and found the designer's freedom at least average for briefcases with integrated screens.
  • It held the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberChiara BORACE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.0114.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000116449

vs Tianmen Juneng Trading Co., Ltd.

2022-01-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)03, 1411
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038