DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008265383-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-02

000116627

Contested design: 008265383-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082653830001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Aurora Frolavia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Lorenzo Amione 23, 10030 Vische, Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Shuangfen Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

6C, Building 1, Yueshan Mansion, Jiafu Road, Shengping Community, Longcheng Street, Longgang Dist., Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

D2T – Orthopedic Pillow Leg Positioner leg pillow shown in a YouTube video

https://www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2019-09-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on a YouTube video published before the contested design's filing date that showed the D2T leg pillow.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations, so the application was undefended.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshots as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found that both leg-pad designs shared the same heart shape, central oval opening, elastic band, zip, and fabric cover.
  • Because the remaining differences were limited to fabric colour and decoration, the contested design did not create a different overall impression and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028