DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008068886-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-04-22

000116749

Contested design: 008068886-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0080688860001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

WMK Trading GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Waltrup 16, 48341 Altenberge, Germany

Represented by

Deborah de Melo Morais

Holder · RCD owner

Chengdu Qinke Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

1604,16/F, Bldg. 3, No. 138 Tianfu 2nd St., Chengdu High-tech Zone, pilot free trade Zone, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

detachable paddle 'Overmont'

ASIN B07 BN9 1HXS; https://www.amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-03-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that all protected features had been disclosed before filing through an Amazon.de listing for an Overmont detachable paddle.
  • The holder was invited to submit observations but filed none, so the disclosure evidence went unrebutted.
  • The Division found the Amazon.de screenshots sufficient to prove disclosure before 3 August 2020 under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing only the features shown in the contested design, the Division found the prior and contested designs identical in the relevant shape features.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of novelty, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129038

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129077

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000128979

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129039

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129055

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129075

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128
000129076

vs Robu Aktiengesellschaft

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)128