DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008147391-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-23

000116130

Contested design: 008147391-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0081473910001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Artur Świątekvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Krokusowa 6, 34326 Pietrzykowice, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Andrzej Biały

Poland (PL)

Al. Wolności 20/42, 42-300 Myszków, Poland

Represented by

Daniel Kurdubski

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureevidence 1 and 3

'Flavor Card' under the 'Itsa Flavor' brand

https://twitter.com/ItsaFlavor/status/750790229598973952?s=20 ; https://twitter.com/ItsaFlavor/status/803644698304782337?s=20 · Twitter / Itsa Flavor · disclosed 2016-07-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested scent-diffuser or flavour-card design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier Itsa Flavor Twitter disclosures.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest the applicant's evidence.
  • The Division accepted the 2016 Twitter screenshots and links as sufficient disclosure of the prior design under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found the card shape and overall appearance created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288