DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008264055-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-07

000117355

Contested design: 008264055-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008264055-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Zhonglineng Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm 501, Building B2, Industrial zone 2, No. 56, Qikeng Second Road, Baolong st., Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ipside

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Zefan Home Furnishing Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

405B, Yangnan Business Building, No.272, Chuangye 2nd Road, Xin'an Street,Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Bluetooth Hat

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B 08D R23 YFQ · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-07-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested knitted Bluetooth hat nearly copied a hat sold on Amazon.de since 20 July 2020 and therefore lacked individual character.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the hats produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b).

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028