DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008264055-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-07

000117378

Contested design: 008264055-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008264055-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Zhonglineng Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm 501, Building B2, Industrial zone 2, No. 56, Qikeng Second Road, Baolong st., Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ipside

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Zefan Home Furnishing Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

405B, Yangnan Business Building, No.272, Chuangye 2nd Road, Xin'an Street,Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Bluetooth Headphones Hat offered by Eversee

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B07VCDHTB5 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-07-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing the contested hat closely reproduced a Bluetooth hat disclosed on Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the informed user would receive the same overall impression from both hats.
  • Given the high degree of design freedom for hats, the minor pattern difference was insufficient; the application was upheld and the design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028