DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007720636-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-30

000116566

Contested design: 007720636-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007720636-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Cappa 2, s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Podnikatelská 565 - Běchovice, 190 11 Praha 9 Czechia

Represented by

Daněk & Partners

Holder · RCD owner

Bikers Crown, s.r.o.

Czechia (CZ)

Pražská 48/IV, 50351 Chlumec nad Cidlinou Czechia

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Motorcycling trousers marketed as 'Trilobite 661 Parado'

https://www.trilobitemoto.cz/index.php/popular-trilobite/item/382-intermot-2018-exposition-trilobite · www.trilobitemoto.cz · disclosed 2017-05-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)Article 7(3)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested motorcycle-trouser design lacked novelty and individual character because the same design had been disclosed on the holder’s website before filing.
  • The holder replied that the earlier Trilobite 661 Parado trousers were its own product and qualified as an unregistered Community design later transformed into the registered design.
  • The Division found the website evidence sufficient to prove public disclosure by 19 May 2017, outside the Article 7(2) grace period, so the holder’s defence failed.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division held that minor differences did not alter the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028