DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008040950-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-08

000117232

Contested design: 008040950-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0080409500001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Saeed Yousefivia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Bienenweg 14, 91623 Sachsen, Germany

Represented by

Reddie & Grose B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Tengyue E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

F/2, No.24, Lane 9, Jianshe Rd., Pinghu Sub-dist., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Tuopuda 1 or 3 pairs of socks

ASIN B07Y2Y7XW4 · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2019-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on four earlier sock designs disclosed before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied, among other evidence, on an Amazon.de listing for Tuopuda socks with ASIN B07Y2Y7XW4 available since 18 September 2019.
  • The holder filed no observations, and the Division accepted the Amazon listing as a prior public disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • The Division found the contested sock created the same overall impression as the prior design and therefore lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028