DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006080222-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-20

000115524

Contested design: 006080222-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0060802220001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guiqing Xiavia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 923, Xin’an Community Committee, Binhe Street Office, Tanghe County, Nanyang City, Henan Province, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

Kandise Willson

Italy (IT)

Via Ramedello, 3, 44042 Corporeno, Italy

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

JOINFREE water shoes

ASIN B07 WRP ZV6S · Amazon.es · disclosed 2018-04-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier online disclosure of the same water-shoe design on Amazon.es before the filing date.
  • The holders filed no observations and did not contest the alleged online disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.es printout as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 and found the prior and contested designs produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holders were ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028