DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008700868-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-25

000117007

Contested design: 008700868-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 350 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008700868-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Activeshopvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Bartosz Manys

Poland (PL)

Zbożowa 26N/2, 32-020 Wieliczka Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

electronic facial cleaner device marketed as URZADZENIE DARSONVAL LZ-006A10W

Product code 117972; URZADZENIE DARSONVAL LZ-006A10W; https://activeshop.com.pl/... · Activeshop website printout corroborated by invoice to a third company · disclosed 2017-09-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and also alleged bad faith, relying on a website printout and a 15 September 2017 invoice for the same product.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held bad faith is not an Article 25(1) invalidity ground, but found the invoice and website printout together sufficiently proved prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found the designs produced the same overall impression apart from an insignificant cable difference, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288