DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007260187-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-07

000118300

Contested design: 007260187-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007260187-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Artur Schäfervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Kölnerstraße 13, 40211 Düsseldorf, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Qing Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 12A Unit 8A Jindiluhuyihao Huanguan road south Longhua district, Shenzhen Guangdong, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for the 'FunTomia Set' showing pads and protectors

ASIN B00KGSLM6W · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-08-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier pad designs allegedly marketed well before the filing date.
  • The applicant submitted Amazon evidence for the 'FunTomia Set' with ASIN B00KGSLM6W, shown as available since 23/08/2016.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the prior web disclosure and the applicant's comparison went unrebutted.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon disclosure under Article 7 and found the compared protectors identical in configuration and face motif, differing only in color.
  • The contested design lacked individual character, so the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.0402.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028