DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008823033-0011

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-15

000118722

Contested design: 008823033-0011

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008823033-0011 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nesperta Europe Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Obornicka 7, 62002 Jelonek, Poland

Represented by

Marta Malgorzata Krzyśków-Szymkowicz

Holder · RCD owner

Piotr Malinowski

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Maria Przybylska-Karczemska

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD3

nail dryers

Community design registration No 007985700-0012 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-07-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on prior design D3 for nail dryers.
  • The applicant argued the designs differed only in immaterial details and that designer freedom for nail dryers was broad.
  • The holders filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted D3 as disclosed, found the compared designs produced the same overall impression, and held the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was invalidated in full, and the holders were ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288