DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008772453-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-16

000117980

Contested design: 008772453-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008772453-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Activeshop sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Graniczna 8B DC2A, 54-610 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Agnieszka Byra

Holder · RCD owner

Piotr Malinowski

Poland (PL)

ul. Piotrkowska 270, 90-361 Łódź, Poland

Represented by

Maria Przybylska-Karczemska

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

Halfmoon nail file shown in the article 'The Ultimate Nail File Guide – Files Explained In Detail'

https://blog.insightcosmetics.com/en/the-ultimate-nail-file-guide · blog.insightcosmetics.com · disclosed 2021-05-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier halfmoon nail-file designs it said had been marketed since at least 2011.
  • It submitted Annex 3, a weblog article dated 21 May 2021 showing a halfmoon nail file, and argued the designer's freedom for nail files was virtually unlimited.
  • The holders filed no observations, so the Division assessed disclosure and individual character first under Article 6(1)(b) CDR.
  • The Division found Annex 3 validly disclosed the prior design, considered designer freedom at least average, and held the contested design created the same overall impression, so it was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288