DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007801725-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-11-30

000117736

Contested design: 007801725-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 007801725-0007 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 007801725-0007 wird für nichtig erklärt.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Penta Shoes, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Polígono Cachapet, P-77, 03330 Crevillente (Alicante), Spanien

Holder · RCD owner

Birkenstock IP GmbH

Germany (DE)

Burg Ockenfels, 53545 Linz am Rhein, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

sandal

ASIN B012NN9BR4 · amazon.de · disclosed 2015-07-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested sandal design contained contradictory views and lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures, including D1.
  • The holder said the filing consistently showed one product, challenged whether the Amazon evidence proved prior disclosure, and maintained that the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing for D1 as a prior internet disclosure before the filing date and found the holder had not rebutted that disclosure.
  • Comparing the protected features, the Division held that any differences were insufficient to change the overall impression on the informed user, so the design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028