DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008463293-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-01

000118377

Contested design: 008463293-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0084632930001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Artur Schäfervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Kölnerstraße 13, 40211 Düsseldorf, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Qing Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 12A, Building 8A, No.1, Jindiluhu, Huanguan South Road, Longhua District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

FunTomia Schoner Kinder Protektoren Schützer Set Schlittschuhe Inliner Skater Schutzbekleidung Gr.S M Lon knee pad product listing

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B00 KGS LM6W · Amazon · disclosed 2016-08-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on an Amazon disclosure of similar knee pads from 23/08/2016 and also alleging inconsistent views.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and assessed individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • It found the front protector shape and overall appearance identical in substance, with the color difference insufficient given the designer's freedom.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b), so the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028