DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008939946-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-15

000118978

Contested design: 008939946-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008939946-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guoxing Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.6, Xialian Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Tengsheng Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 102, Building 5, No. 487, Tangxia Section, Dongshen Road, Tangxia Town, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex E

golden hair remover shown in a YouTube video

https://www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2021-10-12

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

pictures of earlier hair removal device designs allegedly disclosed on Amazon.de

Amazon.de

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested hair-removal-device design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures, especially a YouTube-disclosed golden design, and said designer freedom was relatively high.
  • Holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube screenshots as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and disregarded the Amazon pictures as unsupported for assessing designer freedom.
  • Because the designs were practically identical in shape and differed mainly in colour, the Division found no different overall impression and declared the design invalid under Articles 25(1)(b), 4(1) and 6(1)(b) CDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288