DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008678163-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-12-15

000118985

Contested design: 008678163-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008678163-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield Colorado 80020, United States

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Shilin Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

170 Wanlai Road, Zhanglin Village, Cizao Town, Jinjiang City, Fujian Province, 362200, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

clogs

RCD No 001754854-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying in particular on earlier RCD No 001754854-0001 for clogs.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but did not respond in the invalidity proceedings.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed and that the shared clog shape, strap, holes and raised sole dominated the overall impression.
  • Minor differences in hole arrangement and sole pattern did not alter the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028