DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008734388-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-05

000118981

Contested design: 008734388-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008734388-0007 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

F. Lorenzi Living AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rebbergstrasse 32, 8102 Oberengstringen, Svizzera

Holder · RCD owner

Artisansvia PDF extraction

GR

12A Kyprou Str., 18346, Moschato, Grecia

Represented by

Serena Cipolletti

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAllegato 6

Saint Tropez Sky Blue Flats sandals

https://desienashoes.shop (archived via https://archive.org/web/ on 2021-04-21) · Internet Archive / desienashoes.shop · disclosed 2021-04-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on a prior Saint Tropez sandal model shown on desienashoes.shop and archived on 21 April 2021.
  • The holder, although invited to comment on the invalidity application, filed no observations and left the case undefended.
  • The Division accepted the archived website evidence as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and identified the informed user as a consumer of women's sandals.
  • Given the author's broad design freedom, the differences in lettering size and signs on the sole did not alter the overall impression created by the compared sandals.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the application was upheld and the RCD declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028