DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008734388-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-05

000119001

Contested design: 008734388-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 008734388-0008 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008734388-0008 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

F. Lorenzi Living AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Rebbergstrasse 32, 8102 Oberengstringen, Svizzera

Holder · RCD owner

Artisansvia PDF extraction

GR

12A Kyprou Str., 18346, Moschato, Grecia

Represented by

Serena Cipolletti

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAllegato 6

Resort collection women's sandal model 'Miami' shown in archived website screenshots

https://desienashoes.shop/collections/forte-dei-marmi · Internet Archive / desienashoes.shop · disclosed 2021-04-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7Article 70(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying among other evidence on archived web pages from April 21, 2021 showing its earlier 'Miami' sandal.
  • The holder, although invited to comment on the invalidity application, filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as prior disclosure and found broad designer freedom for women's sandals, so the compared designs created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028