DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008536239-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-25

000119978

Contested design: 008536239-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008536239-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Freddy S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Corso Buenos Aires n. 20, I-20124 Milano, Italy

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Royal Wolf Standard Denim Garment Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

first floor, NO 12, Huimei Huijing north road, Xingtang Town, Zengcheng district, Guangzhou 510000 China

Represented by

Brimondo AB

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Freddy WR.UP Pants trouser design shown in screenshots from an uploaded video

https://www.youtube.com · YouTube · disclosed 2019-01-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of the contested trouser design for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier designs disclosed before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied, inter alia, on YouTube screenshots showing the Freddy WR.UP Pants design uploaded on 23 January 2019.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the YouTube disclosure formed part of the prior art and that the contested and prior designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028