DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007009303-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-04

000118324

Contested design: 007009303-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 007009303-0006 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gabor Shoes Aktiengesellschaftvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Joachim-Gabor-Platz 1, 83024 Rosenheim, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Birkenstock IP GmbH

Germany (DE)

Burg Ockenfels, 53545 Linz am Rhein, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon.de webpage excerpt showing the prior footwear design

ASIN B01MR9LVOJ · amazon.de · disclosed 2017-01-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier disclosed designs including D1.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, and that the earlier designs had not been validly disclosed.
  • The Division accepted D1 as an internet disclosure before 11/10/2019 based on the Amazon listing date, ASIN, and pre-filing product reviews.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested clog design, the Division found only minor differences and no different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld in full and the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028