DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009070097-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-04

000119982

Contested design: 009070097-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009070097-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Crocs, Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

13601 Via Varra, Broomfield, Colorado 80020, United States

Represented by

Fieldfisher LLP

Holder · RCD owner

SAMLUX, spol. s.r.o.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Tiskařská 599/12, 10000, Praha 10, Czechia

Represented by

Patent-K s.r.o.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon offer for Reis Clogs unisex clogs

https://www.amazon.it; ASIN B07 SVN 2K5K · Amazon Italy website · disclosed 2020-03-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on Amazon screenshots of earlier Reis Clogs unisex clogs disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, the informed user, or the comparison advanced by the applicant.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the designer had broad freedom for clogs.
  • It found the common shape, material surface, colour and strap features outweighed minor differences, so both designs created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028