DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008782551-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-11

000120259

Contested design: 008782551-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0087825510001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Celine Aharoni Facialistevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

13 Rue Gustave Courbet, 75116 Paris, France

Represented by

Yamark

Holder · RCD owner

Xinjun Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Group Seven, Taihe Village, Baishui Town, Qiyang County, Yongzhou, Hunan, China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

International design

facial massager

International design registration No DM216988 · WIPO certificate and EUIPO grant of protection certificate for the EU · disclosed 2021-11-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity because the contested facial massager allegedly copied earlier international design registration DM216988 and therefore lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The applicant filed WIPO and EUIPO protection certificates as disclosure evidence; the holder filed no observations in response.
  • The Division accepted prior disclosure, found broad designer freedom for facial massagers, and held that the designs created the same overall impression apart from a minor handle detail.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b), the design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000129241

vs Yi Wing Global Limited

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000132044

vs Xucan XU

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000131244

vs Shenzhen Lumei E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130964

vs Changde Yameixun Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-02-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000130541

vs Medintim SL

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128396

vs Koninklijke Philips N.V.

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288
000128638

vs Xiaoyan Kang

2025-12-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)288