DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009067234-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-05-19

000120381

Contested design: 009067234-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009067234-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Bartosz Fertvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

M. Kopernika 4a/16b, 61880 Poznań, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Martomvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Piaskowa 10, 66-008 Świdnica, Poland

Represented by

Anna Giercarz

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 2

fancy dress costume

ASIN B09 HBJ YBGR; https://www.amazon.com · Amazon · disclosed 2021-09-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier designs disclosed before the filing date.
  • Applicant relied, among other things, on Amazon printouts for a fancy dress costume offered under ASIN B09 HBJ YBGR since 28/09/2021.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon disclosure under Article 7 CDR and found the only remaining difference was an immaterial shade variation.
  • Application upheld on lack of novelty under Article 25(1)(b) and Article 5(1)(b); the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028